Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gracey General Partnership v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Gracey General Partnership
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee, City Mayor Joe Pitts, David Smtih and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitts v. Crow
as 5:2021cv00194
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin and Scott Crow
Petitioner:
Tommy Joe Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Martin
as 4:2021cv00093
Respondent:
Jimmy Martin
Petitioner:
Tommy Joe Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Irvin v. City of Clarksville, TN, et al
as 20-6186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS IRVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AUSTIN PEAY, VII, Esquire, the duly constituted Delinquent Tax Attorney for said county, JIM DURRETT, County Mayor, JOE PITTS, current City Mayor and others
Pitts v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Plaintiff:
Joe Pitts
Intervenor Defendant:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and The Overhead Door Company of Shreveport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
The City of Clarksville, Ted Crozier, Jr., Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
Joe Pitts
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and The Overhead Door Company of Shreveport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Santucci et al
as 4:2019cv00269
Defendant:
Joe Pitts, Doe, Christopher Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Pitts et al
as 4:2019cv00170
Defendant:
Doe, Pyrant and Joe Pitts
Plaintiff:
Eric Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, The City of Clarksville, County Mayor Jim Durrett and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
