Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Meir et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY

as 0:2022cv61502
Plaintiff:
Sara Meir and Sara Meir a/a/o Joshua Nissel, Juliet Meir, and Lea Meir, and Joel Rosenfeld aka Joel Rosenberg
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Rosenfeld v. Stein Mart, Inc. et al

as 1:2020cv02521
Defendant:
Maryanne Morin, Thomas L. Cole, Burton M. Tansky and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld
Rosenfeld IRA v. LogMeIn, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Michael J. Christenson, WILLIAM R. WAGNER, David J. Henshall and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Rosenfeld IRA v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09556
Defendant:
Jan Zijderveld, Michael F. Sanford, James A. Mitarotonda and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Rosenfeld IRA v. Maxwell Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00413
Defendant:
Burkhard Goeschel, Steve Bilodeau, Jorg Buchheim and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Rosenfeld v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Kindred Healthcare, Inc., Benjamin A. Breier, Phyllis R. Yale and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rosenfeld v. Aetna, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Aetna, Inc., Mark T. Bertolini, Fernando Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rosenfeld v. YuMe, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld
Defendant:
YuMe, Inc, Eric Singer, Mitchell Habib and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.