Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2025cv00677
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Smith
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, John Barwick, Lt Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. Illinois et al
as 3:2025cv00547
Plaintiff:
Adam Lujano
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Illinois, John Doe 1, John Barwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Barwick
as 3:2025cv00523
Petitioner:
James E Miller, Jr
Respondent:
John Barwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parlier v Barwick
as 1:2025cv01126
Petitioner:
Aaron Parlier
Respondent:
John Barwick
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. Barwick et al
as 3:2025cv00429
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Defendant:
John Barwick, Brammier, Nurse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. Town of Pinckneyville et al
as 3:2025cv00400
Plaintiff:
Adam Lujano
Defendant:
Town of Pinckneyville, John Doe, John Barwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2025cv00386
Plaintiff:
Adam Lujano
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Christine Brown, Latoya Hughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Brown et al
as 3:2025cv00380
Plaintiff:
Abdul Love
Defendant:
Christine Brown, Percy Myers, Angela Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2025cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kimothy Randall
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. Meyer et al
as 3:2025cv00212
Plaintiff:
Emilio Estrada
Defendant:
Percy Meyer, John Barwick, Tammy Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
