Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Gilliam v. Ala. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2025cv00783
Petitioner:
Mikheal Christopher Gilliam
Respondent:
Ala. Dept. of Corrections, John Hamm, John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. J. F. Ingram State Tech. College et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Defendant:
J. F. Ingram State Tech. College, Annette Funderburk, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Crow (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00255
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Defendant:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Crow
as 1:2025cv00060
Petitioner:
Alonzo Darrell Hale
Respondent:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carter v. Crow (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
Frederick Carter
Defendant:
John Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caphart v. Crow (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00722
Defendant:
John Crow
Plaintiff:
Johnny F. Caphart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Martha Lancaster
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Monica McCoy, John Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Defoe v. Crowe et al
as 5:2024cv01159
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The and John Crowe
Petitioner:
Derrick Lynn Defoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00519
Defendant:
John Crow, Pamela Harris, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Keshon Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Crow et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and John Crow
Petitioner:
Renard L Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
