Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ketcham v. City of Mount Vernon
as 20-14
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Mount Vernon, Michael Hutchins, Allen Patterson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Ketcham
Ketcham v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2017cv07140
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ketcham
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon and John Does Numbered 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04604
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe number 1, 2, 3 and 4 and New York City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Edwin Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gross v. Samudio, et al
as 14-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE GROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer, in his personal capacity, ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board, in his personal capacity, ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board, in his personal capacity and others
Defendant:
GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program, Inc.; JOHN DOES, Numbers 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program, Inc.
Ford v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01996
Defendant:
Correctional Officers John Doe Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, New York City Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer T. Salley and others
Plaintiff:
Eryk Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werts v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00613
Defendant:
Barton, City of New York, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Zaquan Werts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03735
Plaintiff:
Robert Hatcher
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Michael Noboa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Delong v. Paul Quail Transport et al
as 2:2007cv01082
Plaintiff:
Dan R. Delong and Dan R. Delong
Defendant:
Paul Quail Transport, Paul Quail Transport, Paul Quail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
