Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Mark Yates, et al
as 25-5310
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
MARK YATES, WALL & ASSOCIATES, INC., JOHN P. YATES, Warden, BOP and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Yates, et al
as 25-1671
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Warden, BOP, Blair, Officer, BOP, Randle, Lt., BOP and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, et al
as 24-13755
Defendant:
LARRY C. MILLER, ARTHUR E. QUINN, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Stinson Sr. v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02870
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, Patrick E. Stegall, LT. Randle and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson Sr. v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2024cv24354
Defendant:
Wall & Associates, Inc., Larry C. Miller, DBA MR. COOPER NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLCS and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcus McAdams v. C. Edge
as 24-2360
Plaintiff:
Marcus McAdams
Defendant:
C. Edge, Acting Warden, FCI-Forrest City, Arkansas (Originally named as John P. Yates)
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Marcus Allen v. John Yates
as 24-1565
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen
Defendant:
United States of America and John P. Yates
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
