Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Kamran and Company, LLC et al v. SEFA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv08850
Defendant:
John #2 Doe, John #1 Doe, Jamie Arguello and others
Plaintiff:
Kamran Culinex, LLC and Kamran and Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nichols v. Martinez et al
as 3:2024cv01762
Defendant:
Jefferson, Joshua Schoenbeck, John 1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, Lt. Dudek, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koob v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00451
Defendant:
John #1 Doe, J. Barnett, M.J. Blaha and others
Plaintiff:
Igor Koob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Allen Ford
Defendant:
R. Little, Major Ford, Jamar A. Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Taylor County Detention Center
as 23-11269
Plaintiff:
Dennis Haley
Defendant:
Taylor County Detention Center, Ricky Bishop, Sheriff, FNU Norette, Chief and others
Lundy v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lundy
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., A. Crain, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Turn Key Medical
as 23-40618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant / Appellee:
Turn Key Medical, Phipps, Nurse, Hillhouse and others
Cokley v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Cokley
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Snider, Captain Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adelson v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11291
Plaintiff:
Wendy Adelson and Wendy B. Adelson [E-FILER]
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Doe John, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
