Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Adelson v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11291
Plaintiff:
Wendy Adelson
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Doe John, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Titus v. Thornton et al
as 1:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Adam Titus
Defendant:
Thornton, John/Jane Doe, Warden Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Fryear et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Zackary Wright
Defendant:
D Fryear, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2023cv10217
Plaintiff:
Clifton Smith
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Roberts v. Lozada
as 22-11175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrea Lozada, Warden I, TDCJ-Institutional Division, David Reed, Jr., Assistant Warden, TDCJ-Institutional Division, Ricardo Ramirez, Major of Corrections Officer, TDCJ-Institutional Divison and others
Doe et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06665
Plaintiff:
John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bravo v. Garland
as 1:2022cv06736
Plaintiff:
Luis Bravo
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rosa
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, William Mulligan, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
