Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Tulis v. William Orange, et al
as 23-5804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JONATHAN TULIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ORANGE, CITY OF FRANKLIN, TN, ATRIUM HOSPITALITY, LP and others
Crawford v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
John Michael Crawford
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Crawford v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
John R. Crawford
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Tulis v. Orange et al
as 3:2022cv00911
Plaintiff:
David Jonathan Tulis
Defendant:
William Orange, City of Franklin, Tenn., Atrium Hospitality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Pitts
as 22-10245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John R. Crawford
Defendant / Appellee:
Chief Lee Pitts, Badge #300, Lakeside Police Department, Lieutenant Richard Foust, Badge #4179, Tarrant County Sheriff's Office, Sergeant W. Wedel, Badge #0132, Fort Worth Marshal's Office and others
Acuity v. Stevenson et al
as 4:2021cv00417
Defendant:
Lisa Michelle Forrester, John David Crawford, James Adom Milstead and others
Interpleader:
Sabrina M Byrd, Jacob D Stevenson, Michelle R Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Crawford v. Chief Lee Pitts et al
as 4:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Sgt. W. Wedel, Officer Richard Huitt, Deputy Ralph Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John R. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Crawford v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6430
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN BRADLEY CRAWFORD
John Sylvester Crawford v. LA County Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv00263
Respondent:
LA County Superior Court and People of State of California
Petitioner:
John Sylvester Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
