Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Spencer v. Dookhan, et al
as 17-1704
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ, DARREN MCFADDEN, KENNETH WALLACE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNIE DOOKHAN, DANIELLA FRASCA, MARTIN J. WALSH and others
Spencer v. Farak, et al
as 17-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SONYA FARAK, UNKNOWN CHEMIST, MARTIN J. WALSH and others
Spencer, II v. Frank et al
as 1:2016cv12080
Defendant:
Sonya Farak, Unknown Chemist, Martin J. Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer, II v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2016cv12076
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer, II
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Daniella Frasca, Martin J. Walsh and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Paul McKenzie and Jose L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spencer v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2015cv13886
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Daniella Frasca, John Polanowicz and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2013cv11632
Plaintiff:
Todd Moses
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Della Saunders, Xiu Ying Gao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bigby et al
as 1:2013cv11196
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
JudyAnn Bigby, John Auerbach, Linda Han and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKPORT, MA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Atkinson v. Town of Rockport, et al
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. ATKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MA ROCKPORT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, SALEM STATE COLLEGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
