Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Avila et al v. Neville et al
as 3:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Benjamin Neville, Adrian Briseno, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila et al v. Neville et al
as 5:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Benjamin Neville, Adrian Briseno, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv21974
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avila Contreras v. Holder
as 13-4599
Petitioner:
John Kennedy Avila Contreras, AKA John Avila, AKA John K. Avila
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Stanford v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01736
Plaintiff:
Aunray Stanford
Defendant:
City of New York , Dora B. Schriro, Michael Hourihane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al
as 3:2012cv01237
Plaintiff:
John Avila
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association and Ndex West
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara, et al
as 10-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET D. EDWARDS-FLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHERYL ANN YARA, MATTHEW SANDOVAL, HENRY O. SANCHEZ and others
Edwards-Flynn v. Sandoval, et al
as 09-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET D. EDWARDS-FLYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW SANDOVAL, HENRY O. SANCHEZ, JOHN AVILA and others
Defendant:
CHERYL ANN YARA
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara et al
as 6:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Margaret D Edwards-Flynn
Defendant:
Cheryl Ann Yara, Matthew Sandoval, Henry O. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Avila v. Heelys Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01565
Plaintiff:
John Avila and John Avila
Defendant:
Heelys Inc, Michael G Staffaroni, Michael W Hessong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
