Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Amos Arroyo v. John Doe
as 21-7709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMOS JACOB ARROYO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JOHN DOE, NS SUPERINTENDENT JOHN DOE, MAJOR JOHN BARNES and others
Amos Arroyo v. John Ward
as 21-7712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMOS JACOB ARROYO
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT JOHN WARD, SERGEANT JOHN BOYER, SERGEANT JOHN CASPER and others
Amos Arroyo v. John Boyer
as 21-7708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMOS JACOB ARROYO
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR JOHN BARNES, CAPTAIN(S) JOHN DOE, HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL and others
Scheller v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01651
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scheller, Bristol County Retirement System and Joseph S. Maroun
Defendant:
Duston M. Williams, Nutanix, Inc. and Dheeraj Pandey
Petitioner:
David Panczner, City of Birmingham Relief and Retirement System, Ronald Castillo and others
USA v. Yahya Bilal
as 15-4379
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
YAHYA BILAL, aka John Barnes
USA v. Yahya Bilal
as 14-4190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
YAHYA BILAL, aka John Barnes
Mississippi Collision Repair Association et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv00537
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Collision Repair Association , John Mosley , Clinton Body Shop and others
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Partstrader, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Barnes et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01667
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Chilton John Barnes, Jr and Susan Barnes
Barnes v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-50570
Plaintiff:
John Barnes
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
