Cases 1 - 10 of 44
BETTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76476
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BETTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00708
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHN BETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Betts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01507
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
BRUST et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03251
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARSHALL, TIMMIE JONES, JOHN GAINEY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARTIN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03146
Plaintiff:
TRENTON HANKINS, ANDREW WILSON, DANIEL ISOME and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brust et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall, Timmie Jones, John Gainey and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Martin et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02117
Plaintiff:
Trenton Hankins, Andrew Wilson, Daniel Isome and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Betts v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2015cv08495
Plaintiff:
John Betts
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly USA, LLC, Acrux Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Wall et al
as 2:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
John M Johnson
Defendant:
Edward Wall, William Pollard , Cathy Jess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
