Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Harris v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Deborah E. Curcillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2023cv07283
Plaintiff:
Danielle Kelly, Thomas Kelly, Andrew C. Kelly and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CHERRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00331
Petitioner:
JOHN CHERRY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CHERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11916
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 7517, et al
as 19-17079
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CHERRY, ELKHORN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, MARIA CHERRY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
David Bennett v. Gary Langford, et al
as 19-11034
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CHERRY and GARY LANGFORD, Sheriff
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID S. BENNETT
CHERRY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03504
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHN CHERRY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hensley v. Langford et al
as 4:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Willard Todd Hensley
Defendant:
Gary Langford, John Cherry, Brandon Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Langford et al
as 4:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
David S. Bennett
Defendant:
Gary Langford, John Cherry, Hubert Stuckey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
