Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Voznesensky v. Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02919
Plaintiff:
Anton Voznesensky
Defendant:
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., John D. Rogers, Deborah Borg and others
Rogers v. Hall
as 21-60533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John D. Rogers
Defendant / Appellee:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Pelicia E. Hall, in Her Individual Capacity and Sean Smith, In His Individual Capacity
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05745
Plaintiff:
John David Rogers, Jr and John D Rogers, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Mississippi Dep't of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
John D. Rogers
Defendant:
Mississippi Dep't of Corrections, Sean Smith and Pelicia E. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
State of Mississippi By: Affidavit of Steven Tyler v. Bobo et al
as 4:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi By: Affidavit of Steven Tyler
Defendant:
James R. Bobo , William L. Carter and John D. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
John D. Rogers
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rogers v. Horel
as 5:2010cv02319
Petitioner:
John D. Rogers
Respondent:
Robert Horel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Horel
as 3:2010cv02319
Petitioner:
John D. Rogers
Respondent:
Robert Horel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
