Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Renzullo v. Town of Wakefield et al
as 1:2020cv11961
Defendant:
Town of Wakefield, John Doe I, John Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Renzullo, BR and PR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dew v. Turco et al
as 1:2017cv12044
Plaintiff:
DaSheem LaShawn James Dew
Defendant:
Thomas A Turco, III, Steven A. Silva, Oswaldo Videl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deluca et al v. Merner et al
as 4:2015cv40094
Plaintiff:
Michael Deluca and Dawn Deluca
Defendant:
Robert Merner , John Doe I Boston Police Officer, John Doe II Boston Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Carp v. Swayse et al
as 1:2014cv13230
Defendant:
Andrew Swayse, Wayne Sausmer, Xanthi Gionis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Carp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Martin et al
as 1:2014cv11748
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
S Martin, John Doe I, John Doe IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salameh v. Duval et al
as 1:2012cv10165
Plaintiff:
Nadeem Salameh
Defendant:
Ronald Duval, Luis Spencer, Thomas Dickhaut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Litchfield et al v. City of Lowell et al
as 1:2010cv12222
Plaintiff:
John K Litchfield , Helen M Litchfield , Brian Paine and others
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Lt. Busby, Lowell Transitional Living Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontanez et al v. Pires et al
as 4:2009cv40203
Plaintiff:
Tanika Fontanez, Jarmil Tharpe and Kaamil Jenkins
Defendant:
Danielle Pires, Sean Baxter, Deborah Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiles v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2009cv30064
Plaintiff:
Louis Jiles
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Stephen Hill, David Barton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv30003
Plaintiff:
Lucy Jones
Defendant:
Robert McFarlin, John Doe I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
