Cases 1 - 10 of 318
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lairson v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Lairson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leed et al v. Pitney et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cody Leed, Kimberlie Mollette and Aiden Manges
Defendant:
Matthew Pitney, Matthew Hassell, Marshall County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSH v. HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARSH
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA and JOHN DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REEVES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. KOHL'S, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
PARISH v. HINSHAW et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
TONY PARISH
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW, PENNINGTON, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
