Cases filed in Oregon
Pinski v. City of Philomath et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Cynthia Pinski
Defendant: City of Philomath, Blake Bowers, City of Corvallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff: Edward Bailey
Defendant: Multnomah County Sheriff, Michael Reese, CPT. Eric P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Hammon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant: M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bulson-Bratton v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant: John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff: Torrie Carlos Bulson-Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 5 et al v. County of Josephine
as 1:2013cv00825
Defendant: County of Josephine
Plaintiff: John Doe 5, John Doe 6 and John Doe 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lecere Corporation v. Doe et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Defendant: John Doe, 2, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 3 and others
Plaintiff: Lecere Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01030
Plaintiff: John Doe, I, John Doe, I, John Doe, 2 and others
Defendant: The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Type: Torts - Injury None
Doe, 1 et al v. Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01030
Plaintiff: John Doe, 1, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Defendant: Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?