Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Neder v. Beale Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02785
Defendant:
Beale Holdings, LLC, John Does 6-10, Steve McMillen and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Neder
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortega v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv02206
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-3, Debra Fessenden, Andre Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ortega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Luo v. John Doe 1 d/b/a NNaa et al
as 2:2017cv02451
Plaintiff:
Caiyi Luo
Defendant:
John Doe 1 d/b/a NNaa, John Doe 2 d/b/a Allyson*Marcotte*, John Doe 3 d/b/a Wccde Onner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Lovelace v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02152
Plaintiff:
Cleve Wesley Lovelace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02466
Plaintiff:
Cleve Wesley Lovelace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Keller v. City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit et al
as 2:2013cv02166
Plaintiff:
Curtis Keller
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Memphis Police Department's Organized Crime Unit, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Fayette County Commissioners et al
as 2:2008cv02289
Plaintiff:
James Walker
Defendant:
Fayette County Commissioners, The County of Fayette, Fayette County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
