Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Varaksa v. City of McComb et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Varaksa
Defendant:
City of McComb, McComb Police Department and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. John Does 1-7
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Colton Bailey
Defendant:
John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nordstrom v. City of McComb et al
as 5:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nordstrom
Defendant:
City of McComb, McComb Police Department and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kennemer v. Parker County, Texas
as 21-10467
Defendant / Appellee:
La Salle Southwest Corrections, Jack County, Texas, Tom Spurlock, Sheriff of Jack County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John David Kennemer
Gonzalez v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00186
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Shawn R. Gillis, John Does 1-7 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennemer v. Parker County et al
as 4:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Tom Spurlock, FNU Coffee, Larry Fowler and others
Plaintiff:
John David Kennemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fearn v. Miller et al
as 3:2019cv01460
Defendant:
Keith Bruner, Sara Jane del Carmen, Beckie Paquin and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham Fearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stassi et al
as 3:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, John Doe 1-7 and Brett Stassi
Plaintiff:
Clyde Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Does 1-7 v. Abbott et al
as 3:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-7
Defendant:
Greg Abbott and Steven McCraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc et al v. StoneEagle Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc and NexPay Inc
Defendant:
StoneEagle Services Inc , VPay Inc , Robert Mark Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
