Cases 71 - 80 of 190
Carl Turner v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 19-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant / Appellee:
Lindsey Moody, Parole Officer, Arkansas Department of Community Corrections, John Felts, Arkansas Parole Board, Matt Higgins, Police Officer Searcy Pl and others
Roberson v. Phillips et al
as 4:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Grisham Phillips, Gibbens, John Felts and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Edwin Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, Sheri J Flynn, Adam Sexton and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Felts et al
as 5:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Defendant:
D Shields, Melissa Graydon, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2019cv00038
Defendant:
S Armstrong, Wendy Kelley, Billy Cowell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Kelley
as 4:2019cv00312
Defendant:
M Graydon, Jerry Riley, D Shields and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crockett v. Holiday et al
as 4:2018cv00644
Defendant:
Dock Holiday and John Felts
Plaintiff:
Zachary Charles Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. Kelley et al
as 4:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Keith E Coley
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, John Felts, Arthur Osaghae-Nosayi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Roberts et al
as 4:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Wilbert L Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Roberts, Kristie Baker, Jerry Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coley v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Keith E Coley
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.