Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Thomas Kidwell v. GEO Group Incorporated, et al
as 12-17615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS ALEC KIDWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP INCORPORATED, JOHN GAY, Warden and BENNIE ROLLINS, Asst. Deputy Warden
Patterson #117045 v. Ulibari et al
as 2:2012cv02163
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
B Ulibari, D Arroyo, Unknown Kuger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez v. Ryan et al
as 3:2012cv08195
Petitioner:
Raymond Carrion Sanchez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, John Gay and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Geary Walton v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-17055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEARY WAYNE WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, GEO GROUP INCORPORATED, JOHN GAY and others
Womack v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv01524
Plaintiff:
John Donald Womack
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, Charles L Ryan, John Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Gay et al
as 2:2012cv00810
Plaintiff:
Manuel D Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Gay, T Schell, Unknown Haleem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidwell v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alec Kidwell
Defendant:
GEO Group Incorporated, John Gay, Billy Massingill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Boteilho v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 12-15090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOTEILHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, HAROLD CLARKE, ELDON VAIL and others
Ian Branham v. John Gay, et al
as 11-18061
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN THOMAS BRANHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN GAY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Anthony Boteilho v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 11-17300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOTEILHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, HAROLD CLARKE, ELDON VAIL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
