Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Henry v. Tyler et al
as 3:2019cv02869
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Susan R. Salka, Wayne A. Budd and others
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Police Pension Fund v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv06524
Plaintiff:
Evanston Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
James Beer, McKesson Corporation and John H. Hammergren
Evanston Police Pension Fund v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv06525
Plaintiff:
Evanston Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
James Beer, McKesson Corporation and John H. Hammergren
Petitioner:
Therese Halscheid and Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers
Gusinsky v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017cv04248
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky
Defendant:
Andy D. Bryant, Wayne A. Budd, John H. Hammergren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inzlicht v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017cv01850
Plaintiff:
Eli Inzlicht
Defendant:
Andy D. Bryant , Wayne A. Budd , John H. Hammergren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silverman v. Bryant et al
as 3:2017cv00494
Defendant:
Andy D. Bryant, John H. Hammergren, M. Christine Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Silverman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A. Copeland v. Raymond Lane, et al
as 13-16251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A. J. COPELAND, individually and derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. LANE, GARY REINER, LEO APOTHEKER and others
Weissmann v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Senta Weissmann
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morrical v. Whitman et al
as 3:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
Stanley Morrical
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Leo Apotheker, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
