Cases 1 - 5 of 5
American Freedom Defense, et al v. Suburban Mobility Authority, et al
as 19-1311
Defendant / Appellee:
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION (SMART), JOHN HERTEL, individually and in his official capacity as General Manager of SMART and BETH GIBBONS, individually and in her official capacity as Marketing Program Manager of SMART
Defendant:
GARY I. HENDRICKSON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Executive of SMART
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA GELLER, AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE and ROBERT SPENCER
In re: American Freedom Defense, et al
as 19-1052
Respondent:
JOHN HERTEL, BETH GIBBONS and SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION (SMART)
Petitioner:
ROBERT SPENCER, In re: AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE and PAMELA GELLER
American Freedom Defense Initi, et al v. Suburban Mobility Authority, et al
as 11-1538
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE, PAMELA GELLER and ROBERT SPENCER
Defendant - Appellant:
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION (SMART), JOHN HERTEL, individually and in his official capacity as General Manager of SMART and BETH GIBBONS, individually and in her official capacity as Marketing Program Manager of SMART
Defendant:
GARY I. HENDRICKSON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Executive of SMART
Raimondo v. Hood et al
as 2:2010cv15107
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raimondo
Defendant:
Denise Page Hood, United States of America, National Congressional Black Caucus and others
American Freedom Defense Initiative et al v. Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART) et al
as 2:2010cv12134
Plaintiff:
American Freedom Defense Initiative , Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer
Defendant:
Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART), Gary l. Hendrickson, John Hertel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
