Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bramley v. Desert Pool Tech LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02493
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bramley
Defendant:
Desert Pool Tech LLC, John Hinton and Mallory Hinton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kimberly Coster et al v. City of Brea
as 8:2020cv01771
Defendant:
City of Brea
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Coster and John Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HINTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09284
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN HINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abraham et al v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2016cv11642
Plaintiff:
Raymond Abraham , Hershel Allen , Michael Barber and others
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adames v. Hinton et al
as 2:2016cv00963
Petitioner:
Gabriel Adames
Respondent:
John Hinton, Loretta E. Lynch and Jeh C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HINTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016cv00145
Petitioner:
JOHN HINTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Conway et al
as 9:2015cv00427
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Eugene Conway , Onondaga County , Onondaga County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06959
Plaintiff:
Theresa Anderson, Theresa Anderson, Theresa Anderson and others
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HINTON v. NEWMAN et al
as 3:2007cv01826
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHN HINTON
Defendant:
DANIEL NEWMAN, EDDY RAISIN, WILLIAM WHITLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
