Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Meyer v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 0:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. Welsch et al
as 0:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Olmsted County Court, Hans Holland, "Kim" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nile Hubbard
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Lt. Duffy, Sgt. Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Beltz et al
as 0:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crawford
Defendant:
T. Beltz and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 0:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Adams, Patricia J. Pettenger and Marla K. Snead
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp, Benefits Administration Committee, the and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hartmann et al v. Schauer et al
as 0:2021cv02146
Plaintiff:
Michael Otto Hartmann and Diane Hartmann
Defendant:
David E. Schauer, County of Sibley and Possible John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiorito v United States of America et al.
as 0:2020cv02679
Defendant:
BOP General Counsel Doe, Mr. Brewer, Ian Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. FMC Rochester et al
as 0:2020cv00247
Defendant:
FMC Rochester, John & Jane Does # 1-10, Machutt and others
Plaintiff:
Barry L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scher v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2020cv00016
Defendant:
A. Schumacher, V. Mathis, John & Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Scher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Hartley et al
as 0:2019cv01567
Defendant:
Kayla Taylor, Wayne Whipple, Nate Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
