Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Russ McCullough v. World Wrestling Entertainment We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1231
Plaintiff: Evan Singleton, Vito Lograsso, Cassandra Frazier, Individually and as next of kin to her deceased husband, Nelson Lee Frazier, Jr. a/k/a Mabel a/k/a Viscera a/k/a Big Daddy V a/k/a King Mabel and as personal representative of The Estate of Nelson Lee Frazier, Jr., Deceased and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Russ McCullough, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Big Russ McCullough, Ryan Sakoda, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Matthew Robert Wiese, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Luther Reigns and others
Consolidated-Defendant: Robert Windham, Thomas Billington, James Ware and others
Respondent: Kyros Law P.C.
Defendant - Appellee: World Wrestling Entertainment, Incorporated
United States of America v. English (Rosemond) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-940
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Derek Andre English, Ronald Anderson, Brian McCleod, AKA Slim, AKA Brian Connelly, AKA Joseph King, AKA Brian Conley, AKA John A. Conley and others
Defendant - Appellant: James J. Rosemond
Magnuson v. Newman
as 14-3272
Plaintiff - Appellee: Boom! Productions, Inc., Lonely Street Productions, Inc., On Point Security, Incorporated
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Tina Magnuson, for themselves and on behalf of those similarly situated, Allen Kelman, for themselves and on behalf of those similarly situated, Erica Zolberg, for themselves and on behalf of those similarly situated and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: Allen Newman, Matthew Weiner, Gregory Marquette and others
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 14-2253
Plaintiff - Appellant: Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, State of New York, Monroe County and others
Perez v. De La Cruz
as 14-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mendelsshon Perez
Defendant - Appellee: MTA Police Officer "John" De La Cruz, Shield number and first name unknown, Ruddy De La Cruz, Reaymond McDermott, Director of Security Assistant Director and others
Wingate v. Quattrochi
as 14-2257
Plaintiff: Keith Darnell Fair, Karmik Grant-Byas, Romell Duran and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Blake Wingate
Defendant - Appellee: Vincent T. Quattrochi, personally and capacity of office, John Doe, Supreme Court Clerk Kings County, personally and capacity of office, John Doe, Supreme Court Clerk Queens, personally and capacity of office and others
Quezada v. Fischer
as 14-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jose Quezada
Defendant: William Lee, Raymond Koskowski, Edward Burnett and others
Defendant - Appellee: Brian Fischer, Karen Bellamy, Richard Roy and others
Trammell v. State of Delaware
as 14-1371
Plaintiff - Appellant: George K. Trammell, Father, Individually, and as Parent, Guardian and Next Friend of M. Doe, a Minor Child, Individually, Refer to Complaint for Further Party Text
Defendant - Appellee: State of Delaware, Office of the Executive Branch, c/o Jack A. Markell, Constituent Relations and others
Flemming v. Rock
as 14-803
Plaintiff - Appellant: Woodrow Flemming
Defendant - Appellee: William H. Chase, Sergeant at Upstate Correctional Facility, Neal J. Lavigne, Correctional Officer at Upstate Correctional Facility, David Rock, Superintent at Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Tyreek Davis v. Chini Baldwin
as 14-753
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tyreek Davis, on behalf of N. Brown, S. Brown, I. Davis and A. Davis
Defendant - Appellee: Chini Baldwin, Caseworker, in her official and individual capacity, John Mattingly, in his individual and official capacity as Commissioner of ACS, Amanda E. White, in her individual and official capacity as Justice of the Superior Court of Kings County

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?