Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Kendrick v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00673
Defendant:
Lorre Idown, Nancy Marthakis, Centurion Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kendrick
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendell LeMaitre v. Donald Grindstaff
as 22-6645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL J. LEMAITRE
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD GRINDSTAFF, Captain - Mountain View Correctional Institution, ADAM HUGHES, Sergeant- Mountain View Correctional Institution, JOHN KING, Corrections Officer- Mountain View Correctional Institution and others
LeMaitre v. Grindstaff et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
John King, Adam Hughes, FNU Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell J. LeMaitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00126
Defendant:
"John" Turner, "John" King, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Geronimo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01663
Defendant:
"John" Turner, "John" King, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Geronimo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00607
Defendant:
John Aly, Jason Bell, Brad Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Hamzai Tarik Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruse v. Burchett et al
as 0:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Wendell Leonard Cruse
Defendant:
Joseph Burchett, John King, Doe Cristy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00284
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Judy Gilmore, John King and others
Plaintiff:
Harley Dillon Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Prow v. Tom Roy, et al
as 17-2883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew Prow
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Roy, John King, Sandra O'Hara and others
King v. Sachse
as 4:2017cv01233
Petitioner:
John King
Respondent:
Jennifer Sachse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
