Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Greene v. Hendrix
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
John M McHugh and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mulcahy v. McHugh et al
as 1:2013cv12593
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shane Mulcahy
Defendant:
John M McHugh and Maj. Gen. L. Scott Rice
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thundathil v. Lynch, et al
as 16-6343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA D. THUNDATHIL
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense, JONI ERNST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kansas Department for Children v. SourceAmerica, et al
as 16-3228
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, BY AND THROUGH THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ASHTON CARTER, Secretary of Defense and JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army
Defendant Intervenor - Appellant:
SOURCEAMERICA and LAKEVIEW CENTER, INC.
Thomas E. Carpenter v. Carter Ash et al
as 5:2016cv00524
Defendant:
Honorable Carter Ash, Honorable Robert A. McDonald, Honorable John M. McHugh and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Carpenter
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015mc01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
