Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ernest Thompson v. Melvin Nance, et al
as 14-3882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest W.L. Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Melvin Nance, Medical Doctor, CMS
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and John Maples, Jr., Warden, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
Meadows v. Maples et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Terese Marie Meadows
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Weekly, Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph W May
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard L Guy, Jonathan Pickering and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilburn v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Hilburn
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard L Guy, Christopher T Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gene Paul
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard Guy, Audrey Weekly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joseph W May
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard Guy, Christopher Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Terese Marie Meadows
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Benard Williams, Deena Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr and Richard L Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard Fry and D P Neldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Waller
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard L Guy, Christopher T Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
