Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 23-2219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Schiff v. Brown et al
as 8:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, John McCarthy, Nicholas Picerno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banerjee et al v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee and Malancha Banerjee
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Maryland, Montgomery County Executive, Maryland, Montgomery County Department of Police, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Bell v. Frosh et al
as 1:2020cv02920
Defendant:
Brian E. Frosh, John McCarthy, O McCain and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lonon v. McCarthy
as 1:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Howard Lonon
Defendant:
John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Bishop, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv02330
Petitioner:
Anthony Q. Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Kelly v. John McCarthy
as 17-6928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCCARTHY, State Attorney, KATHY KNIGHT, Asst. State Attorney and STATE OF MARYLAND
Kelly v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02066
Petitioner:
Anthony Quentin Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02065
Petitioner:
Anthony Quentin Kelly
Respondent:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and John McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2017cv01611
Plaintiff:
Anthony Quentin Kelly
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Kathy Knight and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
