Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Johnson v. United States et al
as 3:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
HARVEY JOHNSON, and STATE OF TEXAS by and through HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ASSISTIVE AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES and Harvey Johnson
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Magdalena Jara
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, by and through HONORABLE CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense, and HONORABLE JOHN McHUGH, Secretary of the Army
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 0107 Vending Facilities for Blind in Federal Buildings
Payne et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2014cv00369
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Highland Homes, Ltd., J. Baker Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Payne , Mary Beth Payne , David Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Concerned Citizens of St Tammany v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv01118
Plaintiff:
Concerned Citizens of St Tammany
Defendant:
Thomas P Bostick, John McHugh, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore-Ahmed v. McHugh
as 5:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Dawn Moore-Ahmed
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. McHugh
as 5:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Corazon McDonald
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
