Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv05296
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv04186
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Pulido Carlos v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv04123
Plaintiff:
Pulido Carlos
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Gray Davis, Mathew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Dannenberg v. Ayers et al
as 5:2009cv00832
Plaintiff:
John E. Dannenberg
Defendant:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr, R. K. Wong, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blake v. Davis et al
as 1:2008cv00795
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Blake
Defendant:
James Davis and John Monday
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 07-17342
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee:
ROBERT HECKER and RALPH COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JAMES E. TILTON and others
Staffiero vs. Clark, et al.,
as 2:2007cv01657
Petitioner:
Paul Staffiero
Respondent:
Ken Clark, John Monday and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2003cv05895
Defendant:
Thomas Webb, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Marvin E. Speed, II and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
