Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Trethaway v. Pizano et al
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Scott Trethaway
Defendant:
Joseph Pizano, John Morgan, Joseph Dominick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REICHARD v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00349
Defendant:
JAMES BOCK, JOHN GROH, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE A. REICHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-CINTRON v. MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
YARED A. PEREZ-CINTRON
Defendant:
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ADAM HARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSENBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al v. MORGAN & MORGAN et al
as 2:2017cv04250
Defendant:
MORGAN & MORGAN, MATT MORGAN, SCOTT WEINSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSENBAUM & ASSOCIATES, P.C., DAVID A. ROSENBAUM and JEFFREY M. ROSENBAUM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71973
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORGAN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85995
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORGAN and JOHN MORGAN
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DAVIS, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74411
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORGAN DAVIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
