Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Chase v. City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dianna Chase
Defendant:
City of Excelsior Springs, Missouri, Gregory Dull, Bret Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv03200
Plaintiff:
Calvin Mayfield
Defendant:
John Doe, K Peterman, John/Jane # 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv15999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Pryor et al v. Coffee County, TN et al (TV2)
as 4:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Partin, John No. 1 Doe, John No. 2 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Wesley Pryor and Mrs. Suzanne Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kapila v. Vallera et al
as 1:2020cv01760
Defendant:
Columbia Faculty Union, Diana Vallera, John 1-2 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Gitanjali Kapila
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
McCoin et al v. Clay County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Freeda McCoin and Johnny Hull
Defendant:
John No. 1 Doe, Anthony Cain, John No. 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butler et al
as 3:2018cv03038
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jones
Defendant:
Richard Butler, Diane Schwarz, Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Morgan County Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
James Travis Adkins
Defendant:
Morgan County Tennessee , Glen Freytag , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danielle White, et al v. TN, et al
as 14-6019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE M. WHITE
Plaintiff:
JOHN NO. 1 DOE and JOHN NO. 2 DOE, minors
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
