Cases 1 - 6 of 6
United States v. John Provost
as 21-3047
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Provost
State of New Mexico, et al v. Aamodt, et al
as 17-2147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. State Engineer
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUEBLO DE NAMBE, PUEBLO DE POJOAQUE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NANSY CARSON, PAUL DOTSON, HELEN RINKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA FE COUNTY, RIO DE TESUQUE ASSOCIATION, INC. and CITY OF SANTA FE
Appellant:
BG & CO, LLC, MARIE BERNARD, CLARA DEMARIA and others
State of New Mexico, et al v. Aamodt, et al
as 17-2147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. State Engineer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUEBLO DE NAMBE, PUEBLO DE POJOAQUE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NANSY CARSON, PAUL DOTSON, HELEN RINKE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTA FE COUNTY, RIO DE TESUQUE ASSOCIATION, INC. and CITY OF SANTA FE
Appellant:
BG & CO, LLC, MARIE BERNARD, CLARA DEMARIA and others
Provost v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv04053
Petitioner:
John Provost
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bazinet et al v. Thorpe et al
as 4:2014cv40082
Plaintiff:
Bruce L. Bazinet and Lori A. Bazinet
Defendant:
Forrest Thorpe , Mark Savasta , Robert Desrosiers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Mexico, State of, et al v. Aamodt, et al
Plaintiff:
New Mexico, State of
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA , Nambe, Pueblo De , Pojoaque Pueblo of and others
Defendant:
R Lee Aamodt , Interested Parties , City of Santa Fe and others
Movant:
Francesca Orofino and Dianna T MacArthur
Mediator:
Michael C Nelson
Intervenor:
Tesuque Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Association
Pecial_master:
Pierre Levy
Claimant:
Christella Lopez, Florence Medina, Ignacio Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
