Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FOP Lodge 59 et al v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
FOP LODGE 59, BRANDON HOLZHAUER and John Richmond
Defendant:
Jose Rivera, CITY OF EAST CHICAGO and East Chicago City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richmond v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior
as 2:2021cv01103
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
John Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
SOIFER v. RICHMOND
as 2:2019cv04256
Plaintiff:
DONALD SOIFER
Defendant:
JOHN RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daisy Reyes v. Linda Snow, et al
as 5:2019cv00934
Defendant:
Pizza Hut of San Antonio Number 1, Inc., Pizza Hut of San Antonio Number 3, Inc., Pizza Hut of San Antonio Number 11, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daisy Reyes, Joshua Hall, Victoria Haga and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Richmond v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01755
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and John Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Autry v. Pizza Hut of San Antonio, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00411
Plaintiff:
Cora Autry
Defendant:
Newton Associates I, Ltd., Newton Associates, Inc.,, Pizza Hut of San Antonio Number 10, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bennett v City of EC et al
as 2:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
LaQueeta Bennett
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, Indiana and John Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillotson v. East Chicago Indiana City of et al
as 2:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Martell Tillotson
Defendant:
East Chicago Indiana City of and John Richmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
