Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
John Richter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17787
Plaintiff:
JOHN RICHTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62690
Plaintiff:
JOHN RICHTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winn v. Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05246
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Det. CPD Det. John Richter and others
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Winn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison, et al. v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gerard Morrison, Kit Hessel, Glenn Mason and others
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richter et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08187
Plaintiff:
Sharon Richter and John Richter
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berryhill v. Henry et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Jari Askins, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Richter Landscape Company LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Snow and Jonathon Snow
Defendant:
Richter Landscape Company LLC and John Richter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ulibarri v. Dustin et al
as 2:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Trisha Lynn Ulibarri
Defendant:
Darius Dustin, Mike Groves, Rod Plank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dishman v. Devine et al
as 1:2008cv04756
Plaintiff:
Byron Dishman
Defendant:
Richard A. Devine, City of Chicago, Richard J Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
