Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DEMOS v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Defendant:
U.S., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos, John et al v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00721
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, City-Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demos v. USA
as 3:2013cv00014
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. United States Secretary of Defense
as 3:2013cv03004
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
United States Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEMOS et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR. and THE SOCIETY OF T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Demos v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv03084
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
USA and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Demos v. USA
as 1:2010cv01074
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Demos v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00184
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
