Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Logan v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Logan
Defendant:
The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hagan v. Barnett et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hagan
Defendant:
Denise Barnett, Tim Bartley, Marie Elaine Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell, Sr. v. Roberts et al
as 3:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith R. Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant:
John Roberts, William H. Pryor, Jr., Mary S. Scriven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
John Smith v. Jeremy Bush, et al
as 23-1644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, Correctional Facilities Administration, official and personal capacity and RANDEE REWERTS, Warden, official and personal capacity
Smith #225908 v. Bush et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
John Robert Smith #225908
Defendant:
Jeremy Bush and Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John DavisIn re: John Davis
as 23-1380
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Martin et al v. Marion County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Amanda Martin
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Department, Jimmy Clements, Tristan Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Davis v. USA
as 22-1580
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
