Cases 1 - 10 of 1,148
Lewis et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02600
Lead Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis and Frederick Ortiz
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Department of Correction (NYC), John Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17930
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Kasakowski
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Captain Kasakowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hendrick
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Lt. James Hendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-8001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 7:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
District Attorney John Smith and John Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
John Smith v. Towson University
as 22-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWSON UNIVERSITY
HENDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv04975
Petitioner:
MARK HENDERSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
