Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Dunigan v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-6612
Defendant:
S. LEWIS, A. MARTINEZ, M. FORDHAM and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Platsky v. New York Police Department
as 24-1925
Defendant:
NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, KARIMA ETORIA, Lt. Officer JERMAINE ODEN and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY PLATSKY
Interested Party:
CITY OF NEW YORK
Soto v. LINQ Research LLC
as 4:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
LINQ Research LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00357
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
John Soto
Defendant:
Graybar Electric Company, Inc. and Ernesto Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
John Peter Archer v. Donald Pixley et al
as 2:2023cv06251
Petitioner:
John Peter Archer
Respondent:
Donald Pixley, J. Wolters, Xaiver Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Archer v. Pixley et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Peter Archer
Defendant:
Donald Pixley, J. Wolters, Xaiver Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68249
Plaintiff:
JOHN SOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arroyo v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2021cv01638
Plaintiff:
JOHN SOTO ARROYO
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37951
Plaintiff:
JOHN SOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.