Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01728
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simmons v. Barr
as 19-2097
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
John Simmons, AKA Sreven Kaufman, AKA John Symons
James Lomax v. Frank Tennis, et al
as 17-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
LOMAX v. TENNIS et al
as 2:2016cv06566
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOMAX
Defendant:
FRANK J. TENNIS, RICHARD ELLERS, JOHN SYMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rizzuto v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto, Jr.
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, James C. Barnacle, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLINGER et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTONS et al
as 1:2012cv02374
Plaintiff:
Shamirah Bellinger
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department Of Correctons , S.C.I. Rockview Institution , Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELLINGER et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTONS et al
as 2:2012cv03299
Plaintiff:
SHAMIRAH BELLINGER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTONS, S.C.I. ROCKVIEW INSTITUTION, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford Johnson v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-2372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADFORD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, CRAIG HARPSTER, UNIT MANAGER, BUILDING A, RICHARD ELLERS, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Bradford Johnson v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADFORD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, CRAIG HARPSTER, RICHARD ELLERS and others
Bradford Johnson v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 12-8038
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BRADFORD JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARIROSA LAMAS, CRAIG HARPSTER, RICHARD ELLERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
