Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McKnight v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Derrick Molden, Brian Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Darrick Molden, Brian Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. TORMA et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Petitioner:
MICHELLE LEMARIE CLARK
Respondent:
JOANNE TORMA, JOHN TUTTLE and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HIRT v. TORMA et al
as 1:2016cv00024
Petitioner:
SAMANTHA HIRT
Respondent:
JOANNE TORMA, JOHN TUTTLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01003
Plaintiff:
MICKY MAYON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPPOZZA, COLIN FISCHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Tuttle et al
as 4:2015cv01493
Petitioner:
Shawn Christian Murray
Respondent:
John Tuttle, Michael Riess, Kathleen G. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RITTER v. TUTTLE et al
as 3:2015cv01235
Petitioner:
WILLIAM S. RITTER, JR.
Respondent:
John Tuttle, The District Attorney of the County of Monroe and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lockett v. Tuttle
as 3:2015cv01018
Petitioner:
Tramale Lockett
Respondent:
John Tuttle and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RITTER v. TUTTLE et al
as 2:2015cv02140
Petitioner:
WILLIAM S. RITTER, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN TUTTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONROE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montevechi v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Montevechi
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Mathew Osterberg , Jeff Angradi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
