Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Roloff et al v. Washington County et al
as 3:2010cv01487
Plaintiff:
Amy J. Roloff and Matthew J. Roloff
Defendant:
Washington County, John Wheeler and Jay Winchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boatman v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary of Corrections, Gerald H. Abdul-Wasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boatman v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00550
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Secretary of Corrections, Gerald H. Abdul-Wasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Santa Fe Detention Center et al
as 1:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jaime Sarmiento Espinosa
Defendant:
Santa Fe Detention Center and John Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wheeler v. Canadian National Illinois Centr
as PAE/2:08-CV-89506
Plaintiff:
John Wheeler
Defendant:
Canadian National Illinois Centr
WHEELER v. CANADIAN NATIONAL ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89506
Plaintiff:
JOHN WHEELER
Defendant:
CANADIAN NATIONAL ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Shelly v. North Misssissippi Medical Center et al
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Minnie Shelly
Defendant:
North Misssissippi Medical Center, The Stanley Works, Inc., Tupelo Anesthesia Group, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Wheeler v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00749
Plaintiff:
John Wheeler
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wilken, et al. v. Automotive Component Holdings, et al
as 3:2007cv03314
Plaintiff:
Dave Wilken, Teresa Thomas, Virgil Rybczynski and others
Defendant:
Automotive Component Holdings, LLC and Visteon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
