Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Glen Livermore v. Debra Tonhofer, et al
as 20-35978
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH SAWYER, MD, BRENT CARNEY, DOC Dietary Services Program Manager, NEAL RENDLEMAN, MD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN A. LIVERMORE
Agee v. Cuomo
as 19-4160
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy Quinn, LT.; Auburn Correctional Facility, Joseph Bellnier, Deputy Commissioner of "DOCCS" Correctional Facilities, Mr. John Doe #9, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Troy Mitchell, FKA John Doe #5, Mrs. Wade, FKA Jane Doe #14 and Mr. Keith E. Vincent, II, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jkendric Jirelle Agee
Walker, et al v. Corizon Health, et al
as 19-3070
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., FKA Correctional Medical Services, RHONDA DURANT, APRN, KELLY FRENCH, RN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERMAINE WALKER, individually and as administrator of the estate of Marques Davis, deceased and KATHLEEN FORSYTH
Defendant / Appellant:
SOHAIB MOHIUDDIN, M.D.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leidl et al v. The Law Office of Thomas Landis et al
as 2:2010cv05899
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Through 25, John and Jane Does 3 Through 25 and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Leidl and Lisa Wood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
