Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hughley v. Tinney et al (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00570
Defendant:
John A. Tinney, Fred Gray, Jr. and Earnestine Sapp
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughley v. East Alabama Medical Center et al (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00569
Defendant:
East Alabama Medical Center, Dr. Ukachi, Dr. Lock and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Hughley v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnny HughleyIn re: Johnny Hughley
as 23-10297
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY HUGHLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hughley v. Burdette (MAG+)
as 3:2020cv00720
Defendant:
Lisa M. Burdette
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hughley v. The City of Opelika, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00775
Defendant:
The City of Opelika, Alabama, Christopher J. Hughes and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2019cv00506
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hughley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00578
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Alabama State Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. Jones et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 3:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Jay Jones and East Alabama Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughley v. Lee County, Alabama et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 3:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Lee County, Alabama, Chambers County, Alabama, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
