Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Davis v. Core Civic, et al
as 21-7020
Defendant / Appellee:
SERENA BREWER, Nurse Practitioner - DCF, RHODA SHIVLEY, Nurse, RAY LARIMER, Health Service Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Davis v. Crow, et al
as 21-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI QUICK, Chief of Security, MARK KNUTSON, Director Designee ODOC, MR. BENEFIELD, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Davis v. Crow et al
as 6:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Samatha Anderson, Ms. Evan, Tommy Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Splash Kingdom, Inc v. TI Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00604
Counter Defendant:
Kingdom Perspectives, LLC, Kingdom Perspectives-Hudson Oaks, Ltd., Kingdom Perspectives-Nacogdoches, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Jeff Palmer and TI Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Splash Kingdom, Inc. and Splash Kingdom Waterparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv00396
Defendant:
Mark Knutson, Mr. Pfaff, Tiffany Ade and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. GEO Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
GEO Corrections, Amber Martin, FNU Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Martin, et al
as 17-6060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER MARTIN, JOHNNY BLEVINS, FNU WEEKS and others
Davis v. Martin et al
as 5:2016cv01375
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Amber Martin, Johnny Blevins, FNU Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rackley v. Blevins, et al
as 14-6203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD RACKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY BLEVINS, DOC Internal Affairs, JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director, TIM WILKINSON, Warden (DFC) and others
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.