Cases 1 - 10 of 513
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Olah v. Cobb County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv01533
Plaintiff:
Joseph Olah
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Craig Owens and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and SGT TELUR ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Bradford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dawn Shepherd
Defendant:
Bradford County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Gordon Smith and Bradford County Sher John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deandre Arnold v. Chad Chronister, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
