Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Isiah James, Jr. v. Warden Ridgeland CI
as 16-7692
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISIAH JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT
Jody Ward v. Warden Lieber Correctional
as 13-6518
Petitioner - Appellant:
JODY LYNN WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, Director SCDC
Isiah James, Jr. v. Warden Ridgeland Correctional
as 13-6309
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISIAH JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT
Saul Williams v. Warden Lee Correctional
as 12-7045
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAUL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, Director of Corr of State of South Carolina
Clifford Thompson v. Jon Ozmint
as 12-6881
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SC Department of Corrections and WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Derrick Woods v. Warden of Broad River
as 12-6350
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK BENARD WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, Director of SC Dept. of Corrections
John Turner v. Warden of Perry Correctional
as 12-6171
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN BRADLEY TURNER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director
Ward v. Ozmint
as 0:2011cv03277
Petitioner:
Jody Lynn Ward
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Gary Scott v. Anthony Padula
as 11-7394
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY STEVEN SCOTT, former #273698
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY PADULA, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution
Respondent:
JON OZMINT
Furman Thompson v. Warden McCormick Correctional
as 11-7141
Petitioner - Appellant:
FURMAN THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
